Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed31 July 20263359359

83 Crowlands Avenue, ROMFORD, RM7 9HX

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Ghafoor A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed rear outbuilding would constitute a use incidental to the enjoyment of the dwellinghouse as such, within the meaning of Class E of the GPDO 2015

What decided it

The proposed outbuilding's size was genuinely and reasonably required to accommodate the proposed incidental uses (home office, fitness room, snooker room) given the limited size of the main dwelling and the large open garden, and therefore met the basic criteria for a Class E building.

Judgments cited: Emin v SSE [1989] JPL 909; Wallington v SoS for Wales [1990] 62 P & CR 150; Holding v FSS [2004] JPL 1405; Croydon LBC v Gladden [1994] 1PLR 30; Peche d'or Investments v SSE [1996] JPL 311

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.