Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 July 20253359487

The Shanty, 145 The Warren, Caversham Reading, RG4 7TQ

Planning appeal 3359487 at The Shanty, 145 The Warren, Caversham Reading, RG4 7TQ (Reading Borough Council) was dismissed on 25 July 2025 by Inspector Steen A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed extensions and alterations to 145 The Warren would preserve the Grade II listed building known as The Shanty or its setting or any features of special architectural and historic interest (or significance) which it possesses.

extensions and alterations to dwelling

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Steen A
Postcode
RG4 7TQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed extensions and alterations to 145 The Warren would preserve the Grade II listed building known as The Shanty or its setting or any features of special architectural and historic interest (or significance) which it possesses
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers of 147 The Warren and Riverlea with particular regard to privacy

What decided it

The harm to the setting of the Grade II listed building The Shanty, which cannot be outweighed by the limited public benefits of the proposal, conflicts with the development plan and material considerations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
EN1EN6CC7EN11EN13CC8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135Paragraph 212Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

84 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Reading Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed19 October 20266002958
    Pavement O/S 201 Broad Street, Reading, RG1 7QA
  2. Allowed19 October 20266002957
    Pavement O/S 201 Broad Street, Reading, RG1 7QA
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266002956
    Pavement O/S The Range,, Vastern Road,, Reading, RG1 8AL
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266002955
    Pavement O/S The Range,, Vastern Road,, Reading, RG1 8AL
  5. Dismissed25 September 20266014625
    65a Bedford Road, Reading, RG1 7EX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.