Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed5 November 20253359508

Boatmans Bar and Grill, 20 High Street, Walsall Wood, WALSALL, WS9 9LP

for the demolition of an existing public house and construction of part- two, part-three storey block comprising 15 apartments with associated parking and landscaping

Authority
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Plenty B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on trees
  • Whether or not the proposed development would be regarded as a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA) and if so whether any harm conveyed would be outweighed by the scheme's benefits
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with respect to privacy, outlook, noise and disturbance and whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers with respect to the provision of private outdoor space
  • Whether the proposal would make a required contribution towards open space and affordable housing
  • Whether the proposed development would provide safe access for pedestrians onto the public highway
  • The effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation (SAC)

What decided it

The applicant's unchallenged financial viability assessment demonstrating that the scheme could not provide planning obligations without becoming unviable, combined with the proposal's compliance with development plan policies on character, living conditions, highway safety and SAC mitigation.

The benefits of residential development on a previously developed site in a local centre, providing 15 new dwellings and improved pedestrian connectivity, outweighed the loss of the existing public house use and the regrettable loss of a mature ash tree, which would be offset by replacement planting.

Framework references: 181

Plan policies cited: GP2, ENV18, ENV32, CSP4, ENV1, ENV2, ENV3, DW1, DW2, DW3, DW5, DW10, HOU3, OS1, OS2, TRAN2, CSP3, ENV23, EN1, EQ2, CPS3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.