Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 July 20253359579

100 Wembley Park Drive, Wembley, Middlesex, HA9 8HR

Planning appeal 3359579 at 100 Wembley Park Drive, Wembley, Middlesex, HA9 8HR (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 18 July 2025 by Inspector Edwards J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the loss of commercial floorspace as a result of the proposal would be contrary to the policies of the Brent Local Plan 2022.

change of use from Office to House in Multiple Occupation including a ground floor rear extension, rear amenity area and car parking space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Edwards J
Postcode
HA9 8HR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the loss of commercial floorspace as a result of the proposal would be contrary to the policies of the Brent Local Plan 2022
  • Whether the development would provide acceptable living conditions in terms of outlook, noise, privacy as well as the layout and size of rooms
  • Flood risk, resistance and resilience
  • Air quality

What decided it

The failure to provide acceptable living conditions for residents, particularly the poor outlook, noise exposure, privacy issues and inadequate bedroom layout, combined with the unacceptable loss of commercial floorspace without proper viability evidence and the absence of a required flood risk assessment, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan and could not be justified.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
BE4DMP1BH7BSU13BSU12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 61Paragraph 124Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 181

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

552 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice upheld30 September 20263359486
    30 Randall Avenue, London, NW2 7RN
  2. Notice varied and upheld16 September 20263365031
    73A and the Rear Part of 73 Willesden Lane, Kilburn, London, NW6 7RR
  3. Notice varied and upheld21 August 20263346972
    The Lodge Restaurant, The Lodge, Kingsbury Road, London, NW9 9HA
  4. Notice upheld12 August 20263344966
    46 Aylestone Avenue, London, NW6 7AA
  5. Split Decision10 August 20263349809
    10 Birchen Grove, London, NW9 8SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.