Planning appeal decision
41 The Avenue, HITCHIN, SG4 9RQ
r eplacement of roof fascias, soffits and bargeboards. Replacement of existing render finishes. Replacement of windows
- Authority
- North Hertfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Kean G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether, on the facts of the case and relevant planning law, the existing work identified in the LDC application is lawful
What decided it
The replacement works fall within the category of operations for maintenance, improvement or other alteration and have not materially affected the external appearance of the buildings, therefore they do not constitute development and do not require planning permission under s.55(2) of the 1990 Act.
Judgments cited: Burroughs Day v Bristol City Council [1996] 1 P.L.R. 78; London Borough of Haringey v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government, Paul Muir [2019] EWHC 3000 (Admin); Dharmeshkumar v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor [2025] EWHC 25123 (Admin)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®