Planning appeal decision
Land North-West of Hogmoor Lane, Hurst, Hurst, Berkshire, RG10 0DH
Planning appeal 3359898 at Land North-West of Hogmoor Lane, Hurst, Hurst, Berkshire, RG10 0DH (Wokingham Borough Council) was dismissed on 17 October 2025 by Inspector Burnham T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether Tree T14 can be considered veteran and the effect of the proposal on Trees T14 and T16.
outline application for proposed erection of 9no. dwellings and associated access
- Authority
- Wokingham Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Burnham T
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether Tree T14 can be considered veteran and the effect of the proposal on Trees T14 and T16
- The effect of the proposal on the setting of four nearby grade II listed buildings (Buttercups, Bower Cottage, Parkers Cottage and Elder Cottage)
- The effect of the proposal on the Village Centre (Hurst) Area of Special Character (AOSC)
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with regard to the landscape
- The suitability of the site for residential development having regard to the development strategy for the area including whether future occupants of the site would be reliant on private motor vehicles for access to day to day services and facilities
What decided it
The risk of harm to veteran trees T14 and T16 and the less than substantial harm to the setting of four listed buildings were not outweighed by the public benefits, and Framework policies protecting irreplaceable habitats and designated heritage assets provided clear reasons for refusal that disapplied the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
The benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing contribution, economic benefits and biodiversity net gain were outweighed by the harm to veteran trees, the less than substantial harm to four listed buildings' settings, and moderate harm to the AOSC, such that the proposal conflicted with the development plan and was refused.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CC03Policy TB24Policy TB26Policy TB21Policy CP9Policy CCO2Policy CP11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 193Paragraph 187Paragraph 58
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed2 October 20266011060West Court Land, Park Lane, Finchampstead, Wokingham, RG40 4QF
- Dismissed1 October 20266011062Thamesfield Retirement Village, Wargrave Road, Remenham, RG9 2LX
- Dismissed14 September 202660131329 Tamworth Close, Earley, Wokingham, RG6 4EQ
- Dismissed6 August 20266005646Land West of Edney's Hill, Barkham Road, Barkham, RG41 4TG
- Dismissed24 July 2026600819444 Proctors Road, Wokingham, RG40 1RP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®