Planning appeal decision
Land North Of Dixons Wharf, Wilstone, Tring
Planning appeal 3360073 at Land North Of Dixons Wharf, Wilstone, Tring (Dacorum Borough Council) was allowed on 18 August 2025 by Inspector Pattison B, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed dwelling would be in a suitable location having regard to local policies concerned with housing in rural areas and the accessibility of the site to services, employment opportunities and facilities.
Outline planning application for a residential scheme of up to 9 Self- Build plots, sustainable urban drainage (SuDs), and associated works. All matters are reserved except for access
- Authority
- Dacorum Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Pattison B
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed dwelling would be in a suitable location having regard to local policies concerned with housing in rural areas and the accessibility of the site to services, employment opportunities and facilities
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The Council's severe shortfall in five-year housing land supply (1.03 years) and unmet self-build housing demand engaged the tilted balance, and the substantial benefits of the scheme were found to clearly outweigh the identified harms.
the substantial benefits of the scheme, comprising the provision of self-build housing and various economic, biodiversity and social benefits, clearly outweighed the moderate harm to character and appearance and the conflict with the settlement strategy, so the adverse effects did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS2Policy CS7Policy CS11(f)Policy CS12(f)Policy CS12(g)Appendix 3 of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan (2004)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 84Paragraph 110
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Dacorum
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed26 October 20266003892Bulbourne Wood, New Road, Northchurch, Berkhamsted, HP4 1LN
- Allowed14 October 20266006896Apsley Depot, Ebberns Road, Apsley, HP3 9RE
- Dismissed2 October 20266011489Plot HD587047 of Lot B2A, Upper Bourne End Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 2RR
- Dismissed29 July 20266007072Highover Lukes Lane, Gubblecote Tring, HP23 4QQ
- Dismissed13 July 2026600572287 Chambersbury Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP3 8BD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®