Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 November 20253360191

Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, Hampshire, RG26 5DL

Planning appeal 3360191 at Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, Hampshire, RG26 5DL (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was dismissed on 18 November 2025 by Inspector Reeves K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is a suitable location for new residential development having regard to the requirements of the development plan and access to services and facilities.

to develop the site to provide two dwellings, each with a separate car port, bin/cycle store and landscaped garden space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Reeves K
Postcode
RG26 5DL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is a suitable location for new residential development having regard to the requirements of the development plan and access to services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposals on flood risk
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area (Appeal A only)

What decided it

The absence of a Sequential Test demonstrating that the development would be located in the area of lowest flood risk, combined with the site's poor accessibility and location outside the settlement boundary contrary to the spatial strategy, provided clear reasons for refusal that outweighed the modest housing benefits.

The modest housing benefits and efficient reuse of previously developed land were outweighed by the substantial harm arising from the site's unsuitable location in terms of accessibility and the failure to demonstrate compliance with flood risk policy, which conflicts with national and local planning objectives.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SD1Policy SS1Policy SS6Policy H1Policy EM1Policy EM7Policy EM10Policy D2Policy RE1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11
Judgments
Substation Action Save East Suffolk; Watermill Bridge High Court judgment

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

19 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266011048
    Purdues Farm, Mortimer Lane, Fair Oak Green, Stratfield Saye, RG7 2DL
  2. Allowed26 October 20266007550
    75 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266011464
    Old Kiln House, Silchester Road, Tadley, RG263PX
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266011822
    Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266011099
    Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.