Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 June 20253360358

Land To The North Of, London Road, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 9FT

Planning appeal 3360358 at Land To The North Of, London Road, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 9FT (Hart District Council) was dismissed on 24 June 2025 by Inspector Evans L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the boardwalk as installed provides access which is attractive, safe, suitable, convenient and inclusive for all users and provides suitable permeability within the development.

erection of 300 new residential dwellings, including roads, infrastructure, landscaping, open space and associated works without complying with a condition attached to the reserved matters approval Ref: 17/01123/REM dated 01 November 2017 pursuant to outline planning permission Ref: 14/00733/MAJOR, dated 21 November 2016

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Evans L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the boardwalk as installed provides access which is attractive, safe, suitable, convenient and inclusive for all users and provides suitable permeability within the development

What decided it

The boardwalk's narrow sections (1.2m wide) and inadequate safety provisions do not provide access which is safe, suitable, convenient and inclusive for all users, particularly disabled persons, cyclists and families with children, contrary to Policies NBE9, INF3 and HK12 and the NPPF.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy NBE9Policy INF3Policy HK12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 8Paragraph 9Paragraph 12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

49 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hart

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed8 October 20266011669
    Cedars House, Thackhams Lane, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8JG
  2. Dismissed8 September 20266005123
    Parpan, Eversley Centre, Eversley, Hook, RG27 0NJ
  3. Allowed7 September 20266011109
    16 Cricket Green, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8PP
  4. Dismissed3 September 20266004528
    Malthouse Mews, Brew House Lane, Hartley Wintney, RG27 8QA
  5. Allowed1 September 20266011801
    Esso Petrol Station, Hook Road, North Warnborough, RG29 1EU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.