Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 September 20253360574

Suidhe Ban The Nook, Eyam, HOPE VALLEY, S32 5AB

‘stone faced garden room extension with a tiled roof’

Authority
Peak District
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Martinson P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Eyam Conservation Area and the effect on the significance of Suidhe Ban, a non-designated heritage asset

What decided it

The proposal would fail to preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area and cause less than substantial but considerable harm to heritage assets, with public benefits insufficient to outweigh this harm as required by the Framework.

Framework references: 212, 215, 216

Plan policies cited: GSP1, GSP2, GSP3, DS1, L3, DM1, DMC3, DMC5, DMC8, DMH7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.