Planning appeal decision
Suidhe Ban The Nook, Eyam, HOPE VALLEY, S32 5AB
‘stone faced garden room extension with a tiled roof’
- Authority
- Peak District
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Martinson P
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Eyam Conservation Area and the effect on the significance of Suidhe Ban, a non-designated heritage asset
What decided it
The proposal would fail to preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area and cause less than substantial but considerable harm to heritage assets, with public benefits insufficient to outweigh this harm as required by the Framework.
Framework references: 212, 215, 216
Plan policies cited: GSP1, GSP2, GSP3, DS1, L3, DM1, DMC3, DMC5, DMC8, DMH7
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®