Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 September 20253360574

Suidhe Ban The Nook, Eyam, Hope Valley, S32 5AB

Planning appeal 3360574 at Suidhe Ban The Nook, Eyam, Hope Valley, S32 5AB (Peak District) was dismissed on 24 September 2025 by Inspector Martinson P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Eyam Conservation Area and the effect on the significance of Suidhe Ban, a non-designated heritage asset.

‘stone faced garden room extension with a tiled roof’

Authority
Peak District
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Martinson P
Postcode
S32 5AB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Eyam Conservation Area and the effect on the significance of Suidhe Ban, a non-designated heritage asset

What decided it

The proposal would fail to preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area and cause less than substantial but considerable harm to heritage assets, with public benefits insufficient to outweigh this harm as required by the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
GSP1GSP2GSP3DS1L3DM1DMC3DMC5DMC8DMH7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 212Paragraph 215Paragraph 216

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

16 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Peak District

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice upheld23 July 20263364767
    Land Adjacent to B6054, East of Owler Bar, Holmesfield, S17 3BP
  2. Dismissed14 July 20263367251
    13 Sherwood Road, Tideswell, Buxton, SK17 8HS
  3. Dismissed26 May 20266001246
    Dove Head Farm, Buxton Road, Flash, Staffordshire, SK17 0TL
  4. Dismissed15 May 20266002575
    Land to the South East of The Glen, Hollinsclough Rake, SK17 0RF
  5. Dismissed14 May 20263367299
    Marquis of Granby, Hathersage Road, Bamford, S33 0EB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.