Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 June 20253360746

2 Hullbrook Road, Moseley, Birmingham, West Midlands, B13 0JU

Planning appeal 3360746 at 2 Hullbrook Road, Moseley, Birmingham, West Midlands, B13 0JU (Birmingham City Council) was dismissed on 2 June 2025 by Inspector Guest H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

self-build erection of 1 no. dwellinghouse (Use Class C3)

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Guest H
Postcode
B13 0JU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed dwelling would provide adequate living conditions for future occupants, with specific regard to the amount of internal space
  • whether the proposed dwelling would provide adequate living conditions for future occupants, with specific regard to outlook, sunlight and daylight
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with specific regard to whether adequate visibility splays could be achieved
  • whether the proposal would make adequate parking provision

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance, combined with inadequate living conditions for future occupants and unacceptable highway safety risks, outweighed the modest benefits of housing supply and efficient land use.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy PG3Policy TP27Policy TP30Policy DM2Policy DM10Policy DM14Policy DM15
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

133 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Birmingham City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed11 September 20266009133
    1 Westwood Road, Birmingham, B6 7DX
  2. Dismissed9 September 20266008724
    538-540 Stratford Road, Sparkhill, Birmingham, B11 4AL
  3. Dismissed11 August 20266007228
    168 Adderley Road, Birmingham, B8 1EH
  4. Dismissed30 June 20266002364
    807 Pershore Road, Selly Park, Birmingham, B29 7LR
  5. Dismissed24 June 20266006872
    2-2a Beauchamp Avenue, Handsworth Wood, Birmingham, B20 1DR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.