Planning appeal decision
120 Holloway Road, Islington, London, N7 8JE
Planning appeal 3360844 at 120 Holloway Road, Islington, London, N7 8JE (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 28 July 2025 by Inspector Lancaster K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area, with particular regard to whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St Mary Magdalene Conservation Area.
extending up 2 levels to accommodate 7 Flats/apartments
- Authority
- London Borough of Islington
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Lancaster K
- Postcode
- N7 8JE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area, with particular regard to whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St Mary Magdalene Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposed development on the supply of commercial (Use Class E) floorspace
- whether the proposed development would provide an appropriate housing mix
- whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to internal space standards, ceiling height, light, outlook, ventilation, noise, privacy, safety and security, provision of accessible homes and the provision of private outdoor space
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to outlook, daylight and sunlight
- whether the proposed development makes an appropriate contribution towards affordable housing provision and carbon offsetting, and whether the proposed development would be car-free
What decided it
The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the St Mary Magdalene Conservation Area through the scale, bulk, massing and design of the proposed extensions, which would eradicate the visual connection to the original Victorian architectural form and fail to preserve or enhance the conservation area's significance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DH2Policy SP8Policy R4Policy H1Policy H2Policy H4Policy H5Policy H3Policy S4Policy T3Policy PLAN1Policy DH1Policy DH5Policy D3Policy D4Policy HC1Policy D6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Islington
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed22 October 20266006605131 - 132 Upper Street, London, N1 1QP
- Dismissed24 September 202660055902 Highbury Grove Court, Highbury Grove, London, N5 2NG
- Notice varied and upheld10 September 20263355155204 Blackstock Road , London, N5 1EN
- Dismissed28 August 2026600262872 Prebend Street, London, N1 8PR
- Dismissed4 March 2026337333172 Prebend Street, London, N1 8PR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®