Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 June 20253360866

White Bungalow, Ash Lane, Silchester, Hampshire, RG7 2NL

erection of 3 no. detached dwellings (amended scheme to that approved under 23/02778/ROC in respect of Plot 2 and 3)

Authority
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Evans L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be located within a sustainable location within the countryside, including in respect of sustainable transport opportunities
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local area

What decided it

The significant harm to the rural character and appearance of the local area from the suburban appearance and limited spacing of three identical dwellings outweighs the modest benefits of one additional housing unit in the planning balance under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.

Under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework, the modest social and economic benefits of providing one additional 3-bedroom dwelling and 10% biodiversity net gain were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to the character and appearance of the local area and the failure to achieve the environmental role of sustainable development.

Framework references: 11, 83, 84, 110, 135, 139

Plan policies cited: Policy CN9, Policy EM1, Policy EM10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.