Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed2 July 20253361080

Ruskin House Mead Close, Denham, Uxbridge, UB9 5AZ

Planning appeal 3361080 at Ruskin House Mead Close, Denham, Uxbridge, UB9 5AZ (Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *) was allowed on 2 July 2025 by Inspector Ellis G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the disputed condition is reasonable and necessary with particular regard to the openness of the Green Belt.

Demolition of garage and conservatory, single storey side/rear extension, alterations to existing rear extension, alteration to existing drive and formation of new driveway

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ellis G
Postcode
UB9 5AZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the disputed condition is reasonable and necessary with particular regard to the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the condition is precise

What decided it

The removal of Class E permitted development rights only was justified by the need to prevent re-provision of the demolished garage which would undermine the very special circumstances, but Classes A and B restrictions lacked clear justification given the limited scope for further extensions and the national application of permitted development rights.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GB1 of the South Bucks District Local PlanPolicy GB10 of the South Bucks District Local Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 55Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

68 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice varied and upheld4 September 20263349251
    Maple Cottage, Billett Lane, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL3 6DJ
  2. Notice varied and upheld8 July 20263347247
    Small Acres Farm, Stoke Common Road, Fulmer , Buckinghamshire , SL3 6HA
  3. Allowed29 May 20263376692
    Boveney Court Farm Boveney Road, Dorney, Windsor, Buckinghamshire , SL4 6QG
  4. Notice varied and upheld14 May 20263376465
    Land at Denham Mount Blacksmiths Lane, Tatling End, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4HW
  5. Notice varied and upheld14 May 20263364195
    Denham Mount, Blacksmiths Lane, Tatling End, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4HW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.