Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 July 20253361097

5 Edmund Close, HAVERHILL, CB9 9LN

siting of garden studio structure in rear garden for use as tourist/guest accommodation, and extended car parking space at front

Authority
West Suffolk
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Marriott H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • whether the proposed development would provide adequate vehicle and cycle parking
  • whether the proposed development would result in any contamination risks

What decided it

The combined harm to character and appearance, living conditions and lack of adequate parking provision outweighed the benefits of tourism support when assessed against the development plan policies.

Framework references: 57

Plan policies cited: Policy DM2, Policy DM34, Policy DM46, Policy DM14, CS7, CS2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.