Planning appeal decision
Grange Farm, Hollies Lane, Pattingham, Wolverhampton, WV6 7HJ
Planning appeal 3361101 at Grange Farm, Hollies Lane, Pattingham, Wolverhampton, WV6 7HJ (South Staffordshire District Council) was dismissed on 11 July 2025 by Inspector Han U, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.
conversion of redundant barn into 1 no. residential dwelling
- Authority
- South Staffordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Han U
- Postcode
- WV6 7HJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to the development plan and the National Planning Policy Framework
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt including its effect on openness and the purposes of including land within it, having regard to the Framework and the development plan
- if the development is inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The adverse impacts of poor accessibility to services and facilities and conflict with the spatial development strategy significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits of one additional dwelling when assessed against the Framework policies as a whole.
The modest housing benefit of one dwelling was outweighed by the significant harm from poor accessibility to services and facilities and conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply despite the Council's shortfall in five-year housing land supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP1Policy GB1Policy EV6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 84Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed21 October 20266012641The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5NT
- Allowed25 September 20266010537Land to the Rear of 6-12 Long Lane, Newtown, Wolverhampton, WS6 6AU
- Dismissed23 September 20266008866The Paddocks, Bridgnorth Road, Stourton, DY7 6QZ
- Dismissed12 August 20266010048Hilton Colliery Farm Cottage, Red Lane, Essington, WV11 2RD
- Dismissed15 July 20266007394White Lodge, Old Stafford Road, Slade Heath, WV10 7PH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®