Planning appeal decision
Land Known As Hillings Nursery, Bagshot Road, Chobham, Woking, GU24 8DB
Planning appeal 3361214 at Land Known As Hillings Nursery, Bagshot Road, Chobham, Woking, GU24 8DB (Surrey Heath Borough Council) was allowed on 14 August 2025 by Inspector Hocking P, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the mixed use constitutes inappropriate development within the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework.
The mixed use comprising horticultural nursery, storage, landscaping business, car parking and activities ancillary to these uses, and retention of hardstanding and a flat roof structure and retention of shipping containers
- Authority
- Surrey Heath Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- employment-industrial · Change of use
- Inspector
- Hocking P
- Postcode
- GU24 8DB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the mixed use constitutes inappropriate development within the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework
- the effect of the mixed use on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the mixed use on neighbouring living conditions, having particular regard to noise and disturbance
- whether the mixed use is unacceptably harmful to highway safety
- the effect on nature conservation
- if the mixed use is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The northern land was found to be previously developed land, so the expanded mixed use did not constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt and no other unacceptable harms were identified.
having found the mixed use was not inappropriate development in the Green Belt and gave rise to no other planning harms, the Inspector concluded no harm existed to weigh against very special circumstances and the appeal succeeded
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM9Policy DM11Policy CP14A
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 154
- Judgments
- Burdle & Williams v SSE & New Forest DC [1972] 1 WLR 1207
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Surrey Heath Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed18 September 202660121062 Killy Hill, Chobham, GU24 8RF
- Dismissed9 September 20266007519Laurels, Salisbury Terrace, Mytchett, GU16 6DB
- Allowed21 May 20266002295Land At Snows Ride, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6LA
- Dismissed1 May 20263376162Langshot Equestrian Centre, Gracious Pond Road, Chobham, Woking, GU24 8HJ
- Allowed17 April 20263374712Newlyn, Highams Lane, Chobham, Surrey, GU24 8TD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®