Stylehurst Weare Street, Ockley, Dorking, RH5 5JD

Planning appeal 3361224 at Stylehurst Weare Street, Ockley, Dorking, RH5 5JD (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 23 February 2026 by Inspector Sabu R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, Stylehurst, and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses.

conversion of existing residential store/garage into new dwelling, with single storey rear extension, raising of the ridgeline, two rear dormers and introduction of accommodation within the roof

Authority: Mole Valley District Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Hearing
Development: residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector: Sabu R
Postcode: RH5 5JD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building, Stylehurst, and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses
whether the proposal would accord with the Council's development plan strategy for biodiversity net gain

What decided it

The harm to the significance of the Grade II listed building arising from subdivision of its curtilage was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of the scheme.

the limited weight given to the public benefit of a single additional dwelling did not outweigh the considerable weight given to the less than substantial harm to the significance of the listed building

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy EN6Policy EN9
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 212Paragraph 213
Judgments: Attorney-General ex rel Sutcliffe v Calderdale Borough Council [1983] JPL 310

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

23 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

Allowed27 October 20266010634
The Garden House, School Lane, Mickleham, Dorking, RH5 6EW
Dismissed27 October 20266003694
1 Ivy House Cottages, Partridge Lane, Newdigate, RH5 5BU
Dismissed20 October 20266013764
Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
Dismissed19 October 20266011465
Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
Dismissed16 October 20266010203
High Bank,, Mill Hill Lane, Betchworth, RH3 7LS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.