Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld20 July 20263361302

Land to north side of Rotherham Road, Beighton, Sheffield, S20 1AG

the change of use of the Land for the storage, breakers yard, scrap yard, storage of vehicles and sales of vehicles, the installation of associated site cabins and the erection of a boundary fence at the Land on the north side of Rotherham Road, Beighton, Sheffield

Authority
Sheffield City Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Phillips A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the principle of the use is acceptable
  • The effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby residential properties with particular reference to noise
  • The effect on the role of open space in the area
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The development conflicts with the development plan as a whole, particularly Policies H10, H14 and LR5, and planning permission should be refused on the deemed application.

Plan policies cited: Policy H10 of the Sheffield Unitary Development Plan Adopted March 1998, Policy H14 of the Sheffield Unitary Development Plan, Policy LR5 of the Sheffield Unitary Development Plan

Judgments cited: Fairstate Ltd v FFS & Westminster CC [2005] EWCA Civ 283

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.