Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision23 July 20263377264

Samehill Farm and Land to East , Hagg Lane, Sheffield, S10 5PX

Planning appeal 3377264 at Samehill Farm and Land to East , Hagg Lane, Sheffield, S10 5PX (Sheffield City Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 23 July 2026 by Inspector Thompson F, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and development plan policy.

without planning permission unauthorised development at the Land comprising the following, 3.1 The change of use of the Land to equestrian use and 3.2 Operational development consisting of; (i) importation of aggregates and the laying of aggregates on the Land, (ii) the creation of hardstandings (iii) the erection of buildings fences and gates

Appeal type
major · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
other · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Thompson F
Postcode
S10 5PX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and development plan policy.
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.
  • The effect of the development on the Millstone Edge Rough and Fields Local Wildlife Site and ancient woodland.
  • The effect of the development on a historic lane – a non-designated heritage asset.
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development.

What decided it

The Green Belt harm from the operational development (tracks, hardstanding and three buildings) was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist for that development, whereas the use and two buildings were found to preserve openness and cause no material harm.

The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and additional harm to character and appearance, a non-designated heritage asset and a Local Wildlife Site, was not clearly outweighed by the appellant's other considerations (including horse welfare benefits), so very special circumstances did not exist for most of the operational development; but the residential/equestrian use and two of the buildings caused no such harm and were permitted.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GE1Policy GE3Policy CS71Policy GE2Policy GE4Policy GE8Policy BE6Policy GE11Policy GE13Policy GE15
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
Judgments
South Darenth Farms and Cold Store Company Ltd v SSHCLG [2025] EWHC 2646 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

62 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sheffield City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Notice varied and upheld17 September 20263378304
    Step Rehabilitation, 30 Troutbeck Road, Sheffield, S7 2QA
  2. Notice varied and upheld7 September 20263376754
    Land at the Junction of Spital Street, Sorby Street, And Carlisle Street,, Sheffield, S4 7LJ
  3. Notice varied and upheld7 September 20263374622
    Land At Rear Of 551-561 Attercliffe Road, Kimberley Street, Sheffield, S9 3RA
  4. Allowed21 July 20266004273
    Site Of Former 27 Skew Hill, Sheffield, S35 8QW
  5. Notice varied and upheld20 July 20263361302
    Land to North Side of Rotherham Road, Beighton, Sheffield, S20 1AG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.