Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 June 20253361367

Eastfield Stables, May Walk, Elsenham Road, Stansted, CM24 8SS

erection of three-bay cartlodge ancillary to the recently approved holiday lets

Authority
Uttlesford District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Price J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be an appropriate form of development in this location, its effects on the character and appearance of the area and the adequacy of Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) information

What decided it

The proposal is excessive in scale and parking provision relative to the modest holiday lets it serves, conflicts with Policy S7's strict countryside controls, and would harmfully erode the open rural character of the site's central area, with moderate adverse impacts that significantly and demonstrably outweigh minor benefits.

The moderate degree of harm from conflict with Policy S7 and the development plan, and harm to the rural character of the site, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the minor economic benefits and negligible road safety benefits, such that the Framework's presumption in favour of sustainable development did not indicate a decision otherwise than in accordance with the development plan.

Framework references: 11, 135, 187

Plan policies cited: Policy S7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.