Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 August 20253362081

13 Risdale Road, Ashton, Bristol, BS3 2QU

erection of a detached dwellinghouse

Authority
Bristol City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Han U

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • whether the proposed development would be capable of complying with the general condition of planning permission set out at paragraph 13 of Schedule 7A to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) in respect of Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG)

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance caused by the incongruous height and roof design of the proposed dwelling, when weighed against the modest benefits of a single additional house in the context of the tilted balance, significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits.

The significant harm to character and appearance, given substantial weight for consistency with the development plan, outweighed the modest benefits of housing delivery and sustainable design, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 232

Plan policies cited: Policy BCS21, Policy DM26, Policy DM27, Policy DM8, Policy DM29

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.