Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 August 20253362277

Land south of Woodland View, The Green, Egglescliffe, STOCKTON-ON-TEES, TS16 9DB

the conversion of 2 existing barns to 1 detached dwelling and 1 detached dwelling with attached annex, with demolition of existing huts

Authority
Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Hughes L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the preservation or enhancement of the Egglescliffe Conservation Area
  • biodiversity, with particular regard to the extent of Biodiversity Net Gain
  • the living conditions of the new occupiers, with particular regard to privacy
  • the protected species of bats

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the Egglescliffe Conservation Area, when weighed against the public benefits of the proposal under Framework paragraph 215, outweighed those benefits, and the failure to demonstrate statutory Biodiversity Net Gain requirements.

The great weight given to the less than substantial harm to the Egglescliffe Conservation Area outweighed the moderate weight afforded to the public benefits of contributing 2 dwellings to housing supply and minor cumulative economic and social benefits, resulting in dismissal.

Framework references: 11, 16, 73, 125, 135, 187, 212, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy HE2, Policy SD8, Policy SD5, Policy ENV6, Policy ENV5, Policy SD3

Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.