Planning appeal decision
Moonshine Meadow, Cuckfield Road, Ansty, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, RH17 5AL
Planning appeal 3362298 at Moonshine Meadow, Cuckfield Road, Ansty, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, RH17 5AL (Mid Sussex District Council) was dismissed on 30 June 2025 by Inspector Dade E, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location, having regard to the local development strategy.
5 pitch settled gypsy accommodation site including vehicular access permitted under DM/20/1277
- Authority
- Mid Sussex District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Dade E
- Postcode
- RH17 5AL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location, having regard to the local development strategy
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the health and longevity of trees
- The effect of the proposed development on protected species, with particular regard to the long-term conservation status of Great Crested Newts
- Whether other material considerations, including the need for and supply of pitches, outweighs any harm identified such as to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal's failure to demonstrate that great crested newts would not be harmed, which the Inspector found would render a grant of permission unlawful under the Habitats Regulations.
the substantial benefit of the proposal's contribution to the shortfall in pitch supply, together with moderate socio-economic and biodiversity benefits, was significantly and demonstrably outweighed by harms to protected species, trees, and the unsuitability of the location
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP33Policy DP21Policy C1Policy DP37Policy DP38
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 129Paragraph 135Paragraph 187Paragraph 193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Sussex
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed10 September 20266011079Moonshine Meadow, Cuckfield Road, Ansty, RH17 5AL
- Notice varied and upheld6 July 20263376721Land Fir Trees Place, Turners Hill Road, Crawley Down, West Sussex, RH10 4HQ
- Dismissed30 April 20266002774Rocklands, Church Lane, Ardingly, West Sussex, RH17 6UP
- Allowed16 September 20253363187Land Adjacent to Hilgay Cottage , Birchwood Grove, Burgess Hill, West Sussex
- Allowed20 August 20253366246Firs Farm, Copthorne Common, Copthorne, West Sussex, RH10 3LF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®