Planning appeal decision
Telecommunications Mast 76745, Borde Hill Lane, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, RH16 1XP
Planning appeal 3362316 at Telecommunications Mast 76745, Borde Hill Lane, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, RH16 1XP (Mid Sussex District Council) was dismissed on 21 October 2025 by Inspector James A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the significance of designated heritage assets and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives.
Erection of a 30m steel lattice telecommunications mast with 6 antenna apertures to maximum height of 31.3 metres, compound area with chainlink fence, 9 radio equipment cabinets, GPS nodes, meter cabinet, and gabion basket retaining wall
- Authority
- Mid Sussex District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- James A
- Postcode
- RH16 1XP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the significance of designated heritage assets and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The siting and appearance of the proposed installation would cause less than substantial but considerable harm to the significance of nearby designated heritage assets, and clear and convincing justification for this harm has not been demonstrated, as the location and design do not equate to the least harmful option for securing the public benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DP23DP34DP36
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 119Paragraph 120Paragraph 202Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Sussex
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 August 20266010382Grassed Verge of Kings Way, Burgess Hill, RH15 0EA
- Allowed10 November 20253366208Station Goods Yard, Keymer Road, Hassocks, West Sussex, BN6 8JA
- Allowed29 October 202660151205, Dexter Drive, East Grinstead, RH19 4SU
- Dismissed22 October 2026601278111 Barnfield, Balcombe, RH17 6FW
- Dismissed9 October 20266010262Development Site At Former Tower Car Sales, Tower Close, East Grinstead, RH19 3BY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®