Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 March 20263362369

1 Coniston Way, LITTLEHAMPTON, BN17 6SR

h anging tiles on the face of the property are starting to become loose. So will be best to replace hanging tiles with cement board cladding

Authority
Arun District Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
McGlone A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's decision to refuse the application was well founded, turning on whether the appellant can show that the cement board cladding would fall within the relevant condition of Class A of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015

What decided it

The slate grey cement board cladding would not be of similar appearance to the existing reddish-brown brick and red-brown hanging tiles, failing to comply with condition A.3(a) of Class A of the GPDO.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.