Planning appeal decision
1 Coniston Way, LITTLEHAMPTON, BN17 6SR
h anging tiles on the face of the property are starting to become loose. So will be best to replace hanging tiles with cement board cladding
- Authority
- Arun District Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- McGlone A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's decision to refuse the application was well founded, turning on whether the appellant can show that the cement board cladding would fall within the relevant condition of Class A of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015
What decided it
The slate grey cement board cladding would not be of similar appearance to the existing reddish-brown brick and red-brown hanging tiles, failing to comply with condition A.3(a) of Class A of the GPDO.
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®