Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 January 20263362545

26 Marlowe Square , London, CR4 1DT

part single storey / part two storey rear extension, two storey side extension, rear roof extension, conversion of house into five self-contained flats (1 x 3-bed, 3 x 2- bed, 1 x 1-bed/1-Person) all with access to outside amenity, secure cycle/refuse storage and off- street parking

Authority
London Borough of Merton
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Everitt E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 25 Marlowe Square, with particular reference to outlook
  • whether the proposed development makes adequate provision regarding ventilation and overheating
  • whether the proposed development makes adequate provision for energy efficiency
  • whether the proposed development makes adequate provision for affordable housing
  • the effect of the proposed development on air quality
  • whether the proposed development makes adequate provision for fire safety
  • the effect of the proposed access on highway safety

What decided it

The substantial scale and prominence of the proposed rear extension would harmfully dominate the existing building and appear incongruous in the street scene, conflicting with development plan policies on character and appearance.

Plan policies cited: Policy D12.1, Policy D12.3, Policy D12.4, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy CC2.1, Policy CC2.2, Policy CC2.3, Policy CC2.4, Policy CC2.6, Policy H11.1, Policy P15.10, Policy SI1, Policy D12, Policy D8, Policy T6.1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.