Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 July 20253362558

Land Adjacent to Twine Rose Cottage, Heather Lane, Up Nately, Hampshire, RG27 9PT

Planning appeal 3362558 at Land Adjacent to Twine Rose Cottage, Heather Lane, Up Nately, Hampshire, RG27 9PT (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was dismissed on 28 July 2025 by Inspector Barton P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposal, having regard to local and national policy, and accessibility to services and facilities.

demolition of existing outbuilding and erection of residential dwelling with garage

Authority
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Barton P
Postcode
RG27 9PT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site would be a suitable location for the proposal, having regard to local and national policy, and accessibility to services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The adverse impacts of unsuitable location and unacceptable harm to character and appearance significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

The moderate benefits of housing delivery and associated social and economic benefits were outweighed by the significant harm from locating development in an unsustainable, isolated location contrary to Policies SS1, SS6, CN9, EM1 and EM10 and paragraphs 83, 84, 110, 115 and 135 of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SS1Policy SS6Policy CN9Policy EM1Policy EM10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 73Paragraph 83Paragraph 84Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 135
Judgments
Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610; City and Country Bramshill Ltd v SSHLG and others [2021] EWCA Civ 320

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

16 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266011048
    Purdues Farm, Mortimer Lane, Fair Oak Green, Stratfield Saye, RG7 2DL
  2. Allowed26 October 20266007550
    75 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266011464
    Old Kiln House, Silchester Road, Tadley, RG263PX
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266011822
    Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266011099
    Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.