Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 March 20263362961

Whispering Cottages, 3-4 Nuneham , Courtenay, Nuneham, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX44 9NX

change of use of rear building to independent dwelling house with associated curtilage and parking. Alterations to building, including to opening / fenestration

Authority
South Oxfordshire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Moore J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effects of the proposal upon the character or appearance of the Nuneham Courtenay Conservation Area
  • the effects of the proposal upon the setting of the Grade II listed building '3 and 4, A473'
  • the effects of the proposal upon the setting of the Grade I Nuneham Courtenay Registered Park and Garden

What decided it

The less than substantial but considerable heritage harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area and the setting of the listed building, which could not be outweighed by the limited public benefits of one additional dwelling, and which engaged the strong reason to refuse under paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework notwithstanding the housing land supply shortfall.

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area and listed building setting, weighted as considerable and requiring great weight, was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of housing delivery and economic activity, with the heritage protection policies of the Framework applying as a strong reason to refuse despite the five-year housing land supply shortfall.

Framework references: 11, 154, 215

Plan policies cited: ENV6, ENV7, ENV8, ENV10, STRAT6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.