Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld13 July 20263363094

The Land at Suttons Wharf, Palmers Road, London, E2 0RY

Authority
London Borough of Tower Hamlets
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Ghafoor A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the enforcement notice was properly served (ground (e))
  • Whether the steps required by the notice are excessive (ground (f))

What decided it

The steps required by the enforcement notice are not excessive or disproportionate because nothing short of total compliance with the notice's requirements can remedy the breach of planning control.

Judgments cited: Newham LBC v Miah [2016] EWHC 1043 (Admin); Oldham MBC v Tanna [2017] 1 WLR 1970

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.