Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed23 July 20253363452

7 Kenton Mews, Henleaze, Bristol, BS9 4LT

a first-floor rear extension over existing, and two-storey side extension. Relocation of front door and associated works

Authority
Bristol City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Packman J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of No. 1a Ridgehill with particular regard to outlook and light.

What decided it

The proposal's compliance with the BRE vertical sky component test for daylight, combined with the absence of concerns from the neighbouring occupiers themselves, demonstrated that the extension would not result in unacceptable loss of light or outlook to the neighbouring property.

Framework references: 12

Plan policies cited: Policy BCS21, Policy DM27, Policy DM30

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.