Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 September 20253363937

31 Oakhurst, Lichfield , Staffordshire, WS14 9AL

erection of a 3 bedroom dwelling

Authority
Lichfield District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Moulton E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including its impact on a protected tree
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to the adequacy of the access
  • Whether appropriate living conditions would be maintained for the occupants of 31 Oakhurst, with particular regard to outlook and light
  • Whether appropriate living conditions would be provided for future occupiers of the proposal, with regard to outdoor garden space

What decided it

The substantial and long-lasting adverse impacts on character and appearance, highway safety, and neighbouring living conditions significantly and demonstrably outweigh the moderate benefits of providing one additional dwelling.

The benefits of housing delivery and economic benefits from construction and occupation, carrying moderate weight, were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the substantial and long-lasting adverse impacts on character and appearance, highway safety, and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers.

Framework references: 135, 115, 116, 11

Plan policies cited: Core Policy 3, Policy BE1, Policy NR4, Policy ST2, Policy ST1

Judgments cited: R v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council ex parte Milne [2000] EWHC 650

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.