Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 July 20253364198

Hay End Lane Fradley Lichfield Staffordshire, Fradley, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13 8NW

Planning appeal 3364198 at Hay End Lane Fradley Lichfield Staffordshire, Fradley, Lichfield, Staffordshire, WS13 8NW (Lichfield District Council) was dismissed on 31 July 2025 by Inspector Dean S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the site is a suitable location for the development proposed.

residential development of up to 43 dwellings”

Authority
Lichfield District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dean S
Postcode
WS13 8NW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the site is a suitable location for the development proposed
  • the effect of the proposal on the local highway network

What decided it

The unacceptable impact on highway safety at the Hilliard's Cross junction from cumulative vehicle movements, without any mitigation proposed, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of the proposal when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

the adverse impact of unacceptable highway safety effects without mitigation significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and affordable housing provision, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 1Core Policy 6Policy H2Policy Rural 1Policy CP4Policy CP5Policy ST1Policy ST2Policy IP1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 116

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Lichfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed21 October 20266014212
    Land At Wood End Lane, Fradley, WS13 8EN
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266013241
    349 Lichfield Street, Fazeley, Tamworth, B78 3QG
  3. Dismissed20 October 20266014237
    The Cottage, The Drive, Lichfield, WS14 9QT
  4. Dismissed7 September 20266009942
    18 Newick Avenue, Little Aston, Sutton Coldfield, B74 3DA
  5. Dismissed3 September 20266007231
    Land Opposite Kingdom Hall Of Jehovah's Witnesses, Chorley Road, Burntwood, WS7 2PF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.