Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 July 20253364305

Land Rear of Valley View and Meadow Gardens, Church Street, Wales, South Yorkshire, S26 5LQ

Planning appeal 3364305 at Land Rear of Valley View and Meadow Gardens, Church Street, Wales, South Yorkshire, S26 5LQ (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 31 July 2025 by Inspector Skelly C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.

change of use of Green Belt land to residential garden use

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Skelly C
Postcode
S26 5LQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations amounting to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause moderate harm to openness and conflict with the purpose of safeguarding the countryside, with no very special circumstances advanced to justify it.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

37 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rotherham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266011173
    Green Acres, Moat Lane, Wickersley, S66 1DZ
  2. Dismissed5 June 20266004041
    Land South, Of 83 Newhill Road Battison Lane, Rotherham, S63 6LN
  3. Dismissed9 February 20266001358
    8 Grange Gardens, Todwick, Rotherham, S26 1JR
  4. Dismissed30 September 20253371423
    5 Turnshaw Road, Ulley, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S26 3YG
  5. Allowed30 September 20253371303
    Lynncroft Bungalow, Hard Lane, Kiveton Park, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S26 6RP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.