Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 July 20253364577

72 Wilford Grove, Nottingham, NG2 2DU

Planning appeal 3364577 at 72 Wilford Grove, Nottingham, NG2 2DU (Nottingham City Council) was dismissed on 30 July 2025 by Inspector Couper C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the development has resulted in the loss of a dwellinghouse suitable for family occupation, and its effect on the creation and maintenance of balanced communities.

chan ge of use from residential dwelling C3 to HMO C4

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Couper C
Postcode
NG2 2DU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the development has resulted in the loss of a dwellinghouse suitable for family occupation, and its effect on the creation and maintenance of balanced communities
  • the effect of the development on neighbouring occupiers' living conditions, with particular regard to noise and disturbance; and whether the occupants of the host property experience appropriate living conditions, with particular regard to internal communal space

What decided it

The development results in an over-concentration of HMOs in the local area (exceeding the 10% threshold) and lacks robust evidence that the property is unsuitable for family occupation or that local HMO need outweighs the presumption against loss of family housing, thereby undermining the planning objective of balanced, sustainable and mixed communities.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 8 ACSPolicy HO6 LAPPPolicy HO1 LAPPPolicy HO2 LAPPPolicy 10 ACSPolicy DE1 LAPPPolicy IN2 LAPP
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 61

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

170 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Nottingham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266012324
    291 Wigman Road, Nottingham, NG8 4AJ
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266012812
    27 Western Boulevard, Nottingham, NG8 1PE
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266011302
    14-16 Hendon Rise, Nottingham, NG3 3AN
  4. Dismissed17 September 20266010946
    38 Highfield Road, Nottingham, NG7 2JE
  5. Dismissed15 June 20266004681
    79-81 Flat Above, Haydn Road, Nottingham, NG5 2LA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.