Planning appeal decision
Barrow Green Farm , Haxted Road , Lingfield , Surrey, RH7 6DE
Planning appeal 3364704 at Barrow Green Farm , Haxted Road , Lingfield , Surrey, RH7 6DE (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 9 October 2025 by Inspector Francis L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the demolition of existing buildings and development of five residential dwellings with car parking, access, and landscaping
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Francis L
- Postcode
- RH7 6DE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area including its effect on the significance of Barrow Green Farm as a Non-Designated Heritage Asset
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the 'very special circumstances' required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal fails to demonstrate a sustainable location under Framework paragraph 155(c) due to reliance on private vehicles and inadequate mitigation, combined with the loss of the Non-Designated Heritage Asset and harm to character and appearance, which together do not amount to very special circumstances.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt from inappropriate development and significant harm to the Non-Designated Heritage Asset and character and appearance were not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing delivery, biodiversity enhancement, renewable energy, and improved outdoor amenity space, particularly when compared to the less harmful fallback position.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy CSP18Policy DP7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
- Judgments
- Wildie v Wakefield MDC [2013] EWHC 2769 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®