Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 October 20253365077

Land at So 76286 55166, Adj to Brook Farm, Broadwas, Worcester, WR6 5NE

Planning appeal 3365077 at Land at So 76286 55166, Adj to Brook Farm, Broadwas, Worcester, WR6 5NE (Malvern Hills District Council) was dismissed on 14 October 2025 by Inspector O'Neill A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is suitable for residential development having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development.

Permission in Principle for erection of self-build dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Neill A
Postcode
WR6 5NE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is suitable for residential development having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development

What decided it

The lack of safe and convenient access to services and facilities via walking, cycling and public transport would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited housing benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

The conflict with Policy SWDP4 (given significant weight as consistent with the Framework's sustainable transport expectations) and the limited housing benefits of one dwelling (given limited weight) were weighed under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the Framework; the adverse impact of locational unsuitability significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SWDP2Policy SWDP4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 232

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

17 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Malvern Hills

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266002119
    Land at (Os 7897 6938), Dunley, DY13 0TX
  2. Dismissed28 September 20266006722
    Land at (Os 8001, 4009), Drake Street, Welland, WR13 6NB
  3. Dismissed23 June 20266002718
    Land At (Os 7129 6118) Pound Lane, Clifton Upon Teme, WR6 6DQ
  4. Dismissed5 June 20266003962
    Cygnet Lodge, Worcester Road, Hanley Swan, WR8 0EA
  5. Dismissed28 May 20266003843
    The Grange, Hanley Swan, Worcester, WR8 0DN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.