Planning appeal decision
Pinewood Park Capel Road, Rusper, Horsham, RH12 4PZ
Planning appeal 3365225 at Pinewood Park Capel Road, Rusper, Horsham, RH12 4PZ (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 8 October 2025 by Inspector Murray D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the principle of the development accords with the development plan strategy.
Change of use of land to 12 gypsy/traveller pitches and associated works including retention of vehicle access, wildflower meadow and tree planting
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Murray D
- Postcode
- RH12 4PZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the principle of the development accords with the development plan strategy
- The effect on the rural character of the area
- The effect on the living conditions of the intended occupiers
- Whether there would be proper provision for the disposal of foul sewerage from the development
- Whether the site lies in a sustainable location with good accessibility to a range of services and modes of transport (issue raised by Capel Parish Council)
- Whether the Council can demonstrate an adequate supply of Gypsy and Traveller sites at the moment
- The personal circumstances involved including the best interests of children
What decided it
The scheme's conflict with LP Policy H5's small-scale (maximum 4 pitch) limitation and the demonstrated adequacy of the Council's five-year Gypsy and Traveller pitch supply outweighed the personal circumstances of the intended occupiers.
the personal circumstances of the intended occupiers, including the best interests of children and the lack of alternative sites, did not outweigh the harm to rural character and the conflict with the development plan as a whole
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN2Policy H5Policy EN4Policy EN12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 187Paragraph 11Paragraph 75Paragraph 110
- Judgments
- Mole Valley District Council v SSHCLG and Margaret Meloney [2025] EWHC 2127 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed18 September 20266011498Woodstock House, Mole Street, Ockley, RH5 5PB
- Allowed8 July 20263362325Recreation Ground, Barnett Wood Lane, Ashtead, KT21 2BZ
- Allowed21 May 20263373058Land East of Cobham Road and South of the River Mole, Cobham Road, Bookham, Surrey, KT11 3QH
- Allowed6 March 20263375794Unit 3 Crouch Industrial Estate, Barnett Wood Lane, Leatherhead, Surrey, KT22 7DG
- Allowed9 February 20263367463Land to the Rear of Cricketers Close , Cricketers Close, Ockley , Surrey , RH5 5BA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®