Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 August 20253365536

Four Acre Piggery, Teversham Road, Teversham, Cambridge, CB1 9AN

Planning appeal 3365536 at Four Acre Piggery, Teversham Road, Teversham, Cambridge, CB1 9AN (South Cambridgeshire District Council) was dismissed on 12 August 2025 by Inspector Hobbs J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.

Build a house on land used to park and store cars, trucks and lorries for the last 30 years

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hobbs J
Postcode
CB1 9AN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the proposed development would be in an appropriate location, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
  • whether other considerations clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and any other harm so as to amount to very special circumstances

What decided it

The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no qualifying exception, and the modest benefits do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt required to establish very special circumstances.

the modest benefits of housing provision, economic benefits, and potential self-build use did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and limited harm to openness

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy S/4Policy TI/2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 129Paragraph 142Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

26 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Cambridgeshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed23 October 20266005101
    Land North of Pampisford Road, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21 6AH
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266010417
    Land to Rear of No.9 Brewery Lane, Meldreth, Royston, SG8 6NS
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266008631
    19 Church Street, Steeple Morden, SG8 0NJ
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266011793
    Land to the Rear of Queen Adelaide PH, High Street, Croydon, SG8 0DT
  5. Dismissed2 October 20266011365
    Land Adjacent to North Grove, Long Lane, Fowlmere, SG8 7TG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.