Planning appeal decision
Land at Sprucely Farm, Sprucely Farm, Sedgefield , Co Durham, TS21 2BD
Planning appeal 3365616 at Land at Sprucely Farm, Sprucely Farm, Sedgefield , Co Durham, TS21 2BD (Durham County Council) was dismissed on 2 December 2025 by Inspector Normington S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The extent to which feedstock and digestate disposal can be facilitated from within the farm unit.
an Anaerobic Digestion Plant
- Authority
- Durham County Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- minerals-waste · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Normington S
- Postcode
- TS21 2BD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The extent to which feedstock and digestate disposal can be facilitated from within the farm unit.
- The extent to which the proposal accords with the Development Plan in respect of the management of agricultural waste and the location of new waste management facilities.
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area.
- The effect of the proposed development on nearby sensitive receptors with particular regard to odour.
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety and the free flow of traffic.
What decided it
The very significant adverse effect of the scale and industrial form of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside outweighed the identified benefits.
the significant benefits of renewable energy generation, waste hierarchy/self-sufficiency contribution, moderate biodiversity net gain and minor economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the very significant harm to the character and appearance of the landscape
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 10Policy 33Policy 47Policy 60Policy 61Policy MW1Policy 31Policy MW5Policy 21Policy MW7Policy 44Policy 35Policy 41Policy 42Policy 39
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 116
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another [1980] 10 WLUK 258; Holborn Studios Ltd -v- The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Durham County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed22 October 20266007418Land to the West of St Michael's Rise, Hawthorn, SR7 8BY
- Allowed24 July 20263375422Harehill Farm, Haswell Plough, Durham, Durham, DH6 2BA
- Allowed24 July 20266003014Land to the South of Wagtail Lane, Craghead, DH7 0DT
- Allowed8 December 20253365143Land to the South of 28 Station Road , West Rainton, Houghton Le Spring, Durham, DH4 6SF
- Allowed10 November 20253365870Building North East Of 2 Low Friarside Lane, Burnopfield, NE16 6BR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®