Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 July 20253365634

31 Clarence Arcade, Stamford Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne, OL6 7PT

Planning appeal 3365634 at 31 Clarence Arcade, Stamford Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne, OL6 7PT (Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 28 July 2025 by Inspector Hartley S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The land use principle of the development with reference to resultant housing mix in the area.

for the conversion of vacant office space to a 6 bed house in multiple occupation (HMO), 7 bed HMO and 3 bed HMO with associated residents’ coworking space, cinema room, bin storage, cycle storage and minor external alterations

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Hartley S
Postcode
OL6 7PT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The land use principle of the development with reference to resultant housing mix in the area
  • The adequacy of the proposed living conditions including internal arrangements and external amenity space
  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Ashton Town Centre Conservation Area
  • The adequacy of bin storage

What decided it

The absence of evidence to support the LPA's assertions regarding housing mix imbalance, anti-social behaviour, and inadequate living conditions, combined with the appellant's acceptance of conditions limiting occupancy and the benefits of reusing a vacant building in the town centre.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
JP-H3JP-S1UDP 1.3UDP 1.5UDP 1.7UDP H10(a)UDP H10(b)UDP 1.12RD11RD12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135Paragraph 12Paragraph 16

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

55 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266012606
    50-54 Grosvenor Street, Stalybridge, SK15 1RR
  2. Dismissed2 October 20266010069
    2, Ridge Hill Lane, Tameside, SK15 1NF
  3. Dismissed14 September 20266011603
    Land At The Junction Of Newton Street And Clark Way, Hyde, SK14 4RY
  4. Dismissed7 September 20266006049
    308 Stockport Road, Hyde, SK14 5RU
  5. Allowed21 August 20266009460
    157, Lodge Lane, Hyde, SK14 4LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.