Planning appeal decision
Land to South of Orchard Lee, 7 Backwell Hill Road, Backwell, BS48 3PL
Planning appeal 3365815 at Land to South of Orchard Lee, 7 Backwell Hill Road, Backwell, BS48 3PL (North Somerset Council) was dismissed on 26 September 2025 by Inspector Szymanski D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the location, land use and amount of development would be acceptable with regard to the character and appearance of the area including the character, appearance and significance of the Backwell Farleigh Conservation Area.
Permission in Principle for the erection of 3no 1.5 storey dwellings
- Authority
- North Somerset Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Szymanski D
- Postcode
- BS48 3PL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the location, land use and amount of development would be acceptable with regard to the character and appearance of the area including the character, appearance and significance of the Backwell Farleigh Conservation Area
- whether the location, land use and amount of development would be acceptable with regard to policies for the location of new development
- whether the location, land use and amount of development would be acceptable with regard to designated habitats sites
- whether it would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt
- if it would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations and whether this amounts to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The inability to ascertain with sufficient certainty that the proposal would not adversely affect the integrity of the North Somerset and Mendip Bats Special Area of Conservation, which precludes the proposal from proceeding under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017.
The moderate benefits of housing delivery, economic benefits during construction, biodiversity net gain, and renewable energy potential did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, the moderate less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area (to which great weight must be given), and the unresolved habitats integrity issue; very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS5Policy CS6Policy CS12Policy CS14Policy CS32Policy DM3Policy DM12Policy DM32Policy DM37Policy SA2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
- Judgments
- Julian Wood v SSCLG and Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; Waddenzee (C-127/02); People over Wind and Sweetnam
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in North Somerset Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed9 October 20266011867Fairoaks, Cadbury Camp Lane, Clapton-in-Gordano, BS20 7SA
- Dismissed6 August 20266007743Former BT Radio Research Laboratory, Long Lane, Backwell, BS48 3DE
- Dismissed8 June 20266006387Pump House, Land off Kingston Lane, Winford, Bristol, BS40 8DA
- Dismissed11 November 20253366314Land to Southeast of Wood Lane, Clapton in Gordano, BS20 7RQ
- Dismissed17 September 20253362265Bristol Road, Wraxall, BS48 1NE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®