Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Unknown16 December 20253366043

Manor Farm and Land North of Wraysbury Reservoir , Poyle Road, Slough, SL3 0AA

Planning appeal 3366043 at Manor Farm and Land North of Wraysbury Reservoir , Poyle Road, Slough, SL3 0AA (Slough Borough Council) was decided (unknown) on 16 December 2025 by Inspector Rose D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development is inappropriate when assessed against policies in the Development Plan and the Framework.

Demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment to comprise a Data Centre (Use Class B8) and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) with ancillary substation, offices, associated plant, emergency backup generators and associated fuel storage, landscaping, sustainable drainage systems, car and cycle parking, and new and amended vehicular and emergency access from Poyle Road and other associated works

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
employment-industrial · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Rose D
Postcode
SL3 0AA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development is inappropriate when assessed against policies in the Development Plan and the Framework
  • If inappropriate, the effect on openness and conflict with Green Belt purposes (a) and (b)
  • Any other harm including landscape and visual effects, the Strategic Gap and Colne Valley Regional Park, availability of alternative sites, deliverability, effect on future Heathrow expansion, and effect on heritage assets
  • What considerations weigh in favour of the development, including need, locational requirements, deliverability, economic impact, employment, skills, social benefits, climate change, biodiversity net gain and accessibility improvements
  • Whether other considerations clearly outweigh any harm to the Green Belt and any other harm, and whether very special circumstances exist
  • Whether the proposal would be in accordance with the Development Plan

What decided it

The overwhelming and unmet need for hyperscale data centre and BESS capacity in the Slough Availability Zone, combined with the absence of any suitable alternative site and the site's classification as grey belt land not constituting inappropriate development.

The substantial and significant benefits of meeting an overwhelming unmet need for data centre and BESS capacity, together with economic, climate and landscape benefits, outweighed the moderate and lesser harms to character, the Strategic Gap, the Colne Valley Regional Park and HAL's aspirations, and outweighed the less than substantial heritage harm to two listed buildings, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development applied and permission was granted.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 1 (Spatial Strategy)Core Policy 2 (Green Belt and Open Spaces)Saved Policy CG1 (Colne Valley Park)Saved Policy CG9 (Strategic Gap)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 49Paragraph 57Paragraph 58Paragraph 85Paragraph 86Paragraph 87Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 187Paragraph 212Paragraph 215Paragraph 232
Judgments
Mole Valley DC v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2025] EWHC 2127 (Admin); Helioslough Limited v SSCLG [2011] EWHC 2054 (Admin); Goodman Logistics Developments (UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Slough Borough Council [2017] EWHC 947 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

50 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Slough

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice upheld28 September 20263373976
    62 Faraday Road, Slough, SL2 1RU
  2. Notice varied and upheld22 September 20263376201
    9 Elmshott Lane, Slough, SL1 5QS
  3. Dismissed30 July 20266006810
    6 Queens Road, Slough, SL1 3QP
  4. Notice varied and upheld20 July 20263364692
    20 Marlborough Road, Slough, SL3 7LH
  5. Dismissed7 July 20266005311
    17 Langley Road, Slough, SL3 7AE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.