Planning appeal decision
6 Queens Road, Slough, SL1 3QP
Planning appeal 6006810 at 6 Queens Road, Slough, SL1 3QP (Slough) was dismissed on 30 July 2026 by Inspector D Marley, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to outlook, daylight, privacy, and noise and disturbance.
described on the application form as “Conversion of a single-family dwelling, Semi-detached house, into five one-bedroom flats for 2 People, each flat is self-contained with its own kitchen, bathroom, and living space. Each flat has a secure, independent entrance. With side and back extensions & a Loft conversion
- Authority
- Slough
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- D Marley
- Postcode
- SL1 3QP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to outlook, daylight, privacy, and noise and disturbance
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on existing housing stock, with particular regard to the effect on family housing
- whether the proposal would be suitably located, with particular regard to relevant development plan policies concerning the location of development
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to parking
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to outlook, privacy, noise and disturbance, and daylight
What decided it
The poor living conditions for future occupiers, particularly the oppressive outlook and inadequate daylight for Flats D and E and the lack of privacy for ground floor flats, combined with the harmful effect on character and appearance and the loss of family housing, substantially and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing supply benefit.
The modest benefit of 4 additional dwellings and redevelopment of previously developed land (moderate weight) was substantially outweighed by the poor living conditions for future occupiers, harm to character and appearance, loss of family dwelling, and unsuitable location (substantial weight combined), such that the harm significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Policy 4 of the Slough Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2006-2026Core Policy 7 of the Slough Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2006-2026Core Policy 8 of the Slough Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2006-2026Policy EN1 of the Local Plan for Slough 2004Policy EN2 of the Local Plan for Slough 2004Policy H15 of the Local Plan for Slough 2004Policy T2 of the Local Plan for Slough 2004Slough Local Development Framework Residential Extensions Guidelines Supplementary Planning Document (2010)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Slough
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed27 October 2026601408472 Belfast Avenue, Slough, SL1 3HL
- Dismissed8 October 2026601186647, Ragstone Road,, Slough,, SL1 2PP
- Notice upheld28 September 2026337397662 Faraday Road, Slough, SL2 1RU
- Notice varied and upheld25 September 20263369048Land at 33 Hillside, Slough, SL1 2RW
- Allowed25 September 202660107309, Yew Tree Road, Slough, SL1 2AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®