Planning appeal decision
Earls Croft Earlsdown, Dallington, Heathfield, East Sussex, TN21 9JE
Planning appeal 3366199 at Earls Croft Earlsdown, Dallington, Heathfield, East Sussex, TN21 9JE (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 7 November 2025 by Inspector Coles C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to the location of the site within the High Weald National Landscape (HWNL).
demolition of existing stable block and new self-build, live work dwelling
- Authority
- Rother District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Coles C
- Postcode
- TN21 9JE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to the location of the site within the High Weald National Landscape (HWNL)
- whether the proposal would be sustainably located with respect to accessibility to essential services and facilities required for day-to-day living
What decided it
The proposed development would cause harm to the rural character and scenic beauty of the High Weald National Landscape, which is an asset of particular importance receiving the highest level of protection in the Framework, and this harm is not outweighed by the benefits of the scheme.
The harm to the character and scenic beauty of the High Weald National Landscape, given its highest level of protection, outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, self-build provision, effective use of previously developed land, Passivhaus construction standards and economic benefits of construction.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy OSS4Policy EN1Policy EN3Policy RA2Policy RA3Policy PC1Policy OSS2Policy OSS3Policy TR3Policy DEN1Policy DEN2Policy DEN6Policy DEN7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 189Paragraph 84Paragraph 89Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rother District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed14 October 20266007775Land Adjacent to Broadlawns, Whitebread Lane, Beckley, TN31 6TY
- Dismissed12 October 20266010105Upper Morgay Wood, Junction Road, Staplecross, TN32 5SH
- Dismissed17 August 20266009653150 Barnhorn Road, Bexhill on Sea, TN39 4QL
- Dismissed14 August 20266007206Land Between 18-20 Collington Park Crescent, Bexhill on Sea, TN39 3RF
- Dismissed1 June 20266002188Cadborough Farm - Land Northwest of, Cadborough Gate, Rye, TN31 6AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®