Planning appeal decision
Land Opposite the Pegasus PH, Craddock Street, Wolverhampton, WV6 0NZ
Planning appeal 3366256 at Land Opposite the Pegasus PH, Craddock Street, Wolverhampton, WV6 0NZ (Wolverhampton City Council) was allowed on 5 August 2025 by Inspector Hughes L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area.
the installation of a 20m monopole supporting 6 no. antennas, 2 no. 0.3m dishes, 2 no. cabinets, associated ancillary equipment and development ancillary thereto
- Authority
- Wolverhampton City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Hughes L
- Postcode
- WV6 0NZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the siting and appearance of the proposed installation would provide acceptable living conditions for the future occupiers of an adjoining allocated housing site with regard to outlook
- if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The lack of any identified suitable alternative sites to deliver improved coverage and capacity, combined with the significant social and economic benefits of the installation, outweighed the limited harm to character and appearance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- UDP Policy D6UDP Policy D7UDP Policy D8UDP Policy D9UDP Policy EP20BCCS Policy ENV2BCCS Policy CSP4
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wolverhampton
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 20266013350Wergs Road, Wolverhampton, WV6 8QN
- Allowed26 October 20266013623Footpath Outside 43 Dunkley Street, Worverhampton, WV1 4AN
- Allowed26 October 20266013620Footpath Outside 43 Dunkley Street, Worverhampton, WV1 4AN
- Dismissed22 October 20266014499104 Woodthorne Road South, Wolverhampton, WV6 8SW
- Dismissed13 October 202660146534 Broadstone Close, Wolverhampton, WV4 5EP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®