Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed5 August 20253366256

Land Opposite the Pegasus PH, Craddock Street, Wolverhampton, WV6 0NZ

the installation of a 20m monopole supporting 6 no. antennas, 2 no. 0.3m dishes, 2 no. cabinets, associated ancillary equipment and development ancillary thereto

Authority
Wolverhampton City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hughes L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the siting and appearance of the proposed installation would provide acceptable living conditions for the future occupiers of an adjoining allocated housing site with regard to outlook
  • if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The lack of any identified suitable alternative sites to deliver improved coverage and capacity, combined with the significant social and economic benefits of the installation, outweighed the limited harm to character and appearance.

Plan policies cited: UDP Policy D6, UDP Policy D7, UDP Policy D8, UDP Policy D9, UDP Policy EP20, BCCS Policy ENV2, BCCS Policy CSP4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.