Planning appeal decision
Rushmere Farm Stables Crossways, Coleford, GL16 8QP
Planning appeal 3366502 at Rushmere Farm Stables Crossways, Coleford, GL16 8QP (Forest of Dean District Council) was dismissed on 6 March 2026 by Inspector Moss J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The main issue is whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a LDC is well founded.
the use of land for the siting of an unrestricted number of static caravans (within the legal definition of a caravan) for an unrestricted residential purpose all year round and the siting of an unrestricted number of tents for an unrestricted residential purpose all year round together with the siting of an unrestricted number of touring caravans with no individual touring caravan being sited on the site for longer than 4 weeks (as required by condition 03 of planning permission P1042/12/FUL)
- Authority
- Forest of Dean District Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Moss J
- Postcode
- GL16 8QP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The main issue is whether the Council's decision to refuse to grant a LDC is well founded.
What decided it
The Inspector concluded that the permanent residential element of the proposed use would, as a matter of fact and degree, constitute a material change of use from the existing lawful temporary holiday/tourism use, and so was not permitted.
What the Inspector cited
- Judgments
- Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd v the Scottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 74; Lambeth LBC v SSCLG & Others [2019] UKSC 33; Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30; Breckland DC v SSHCLG & Plumtree Country Park Limited (CO/1919/2019); Pioneer Aggregates (UK) Ltd v SSE [1984] JPL 651; Slough Estates v Slough BC [1969] 21 P&CR 573; R (oao Shepway DC) v Ashford BC [1998] EWHC Admin 488; I'm Your Man Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [1999] 77 P&CR 251; R (oao) Altunkaynak v Northamptonshire Magistrates Court & Kettering Borough Council [2012] EWHC 174 (Admin); Lambeth London Borough Council v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2019] UKSC 33; [2019] 1 W.L.R. 4317; Winchester CC v SSCLG [2013] EWHC 101 (Admin); Cotswold Grange Country Park v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] EWHC 1138 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Forest of Dean
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed23 September 20266008171Land Adjacent to Parkend Club, Castlemain, Parkend, GL15 4JZ
- Dismissed5 August 2026600873111 The Scarr, Newent, GL18 1DQ
- Dismissed20 July 20266006083Land At 33 High Street, Lydney, GL15 5DP
- Dismissed20 July 20266005801Land Adjacent Swan House Tea Room, Cone Valley, Woolaston, GL15 6AD
- Dismissed8 July 20266001129Land Between Redhouse and Bluebell Cottage, Brockhollands,, Bream, GL15 4PP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®