Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 October 20253366669

51 Arundel Avenue, Liverpool, L17 3BY

Planning appeal 3366669 at 51 Arundel Avenue, Liverpool, L17 3BY (Liverpool City Council) was dismissed on 10 October 2025 by Inspector Gravett R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the residential character of the area, with particular regards to the balance and mix of housing.

to reinstate fire damaged building and carry out alterations to include new roof structure, front and rear gables, insertion of new windows and doors, dormer at rear and change of use from dwelling (Use Class C3) to 1 no. three bed and 1 no. five bed dwelling house in multiple occupation (Use Class C4); with associated installation of bike store to rear

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Gravett R
Postcode
L17 3BY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the residential character of the area, with particular regards to the balance and mix of housing
  • whether acceptable living conditions could be provided for future occupiers of the proposed development, regarding light, outlook, privacy, noise and odour
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing residents in the surrounding area, with particular regards to noise and disturbance
  • whether the proposed development would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed building, known as 'rear entrance gateway, steps and attached boundary walls at Toxteth Park Cemetery' and the effect on the significance of the Toxteth Park Cemetery, a Grade II listed Registered Park and Garden, through development within its setting
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Toxteth Park and Avenues Conservation Area
  • whether the proposed development makes appropriate provision for cycle parking

What decided it

The proposal would cause significant harm to the residential character of the area by increasing HMO concentration and losing a family dwelling, combined with unacceptable living conditions for future occupiers and significant harm to existing residents' amenity, which outweighed the moderate benefits of housing supply and heritage preservation.

The moderate benefits of housing supply, reinstatement of a fire-damaged building, and preservation of heritage assets were outweighed by the substantial weight given to conflicts with development plan policies on housing mix, residential character and amenity standards, and the substantial conflict with the Framework's requirement for appropriate housing mix and high amenity standards.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H7Policy H8Policy H10Policy H11Policy R1Policy TP5Policy UD1Policy UD2Policy UD7Policy HD1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 209

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

241 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Liverpool City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed6 October 20266010099
    33 Liscard Road, Liverpool, L15 0HH
  2. Dismissed9 September 20266008534
    356 Prescot Road, Liverpool, L13 3AP
  3. Allowed17 August 20266010623
    197 Alderson Road, Liverpool, L15 1HQ
  4. Dismissed17 August 20266009126
    6 Grenadier Drive, Liverpool, L12 4ZN
  5. Dismissed3 July 20266002841
    39 Gresford Avenue, Liverpool, L17 2AN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.