Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed22 August 20253366680

Land at 91 Mayhew Crescent and, To the Rear of 83 to 93 Mayhew Crescent, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire , HP13 6DF

Planning appeal 3366680 at Land at 91 Mayhew Crescent and, To the Rear of 83 to 93 Mayhew Crescent, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire , HP13 6DF (Buckinghamshire Council - Wycombe Area *) was allowed on 22 August 2025 by Inspector Bowden N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development and being mindful of the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, neighbours and future occupants living conditions and protected species.

the erection of a 2 pairs of semi detached houses (4 in total), with access from Mayhew Crescent involving the demolition of 91 Mayhew Crescent to form an access and remediation works to number 93 Mayhew Crescent

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bowden N
Postcode
HP13 6DF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development and being mindful of the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, neighbours and future occupants living conditions and protected species

What decided it

Permission in principle is a two-stage process where matters of principle (location, land use and amount) are separated from technical details, and the Inspector found the principle of development acceptable on the merits, with detailed concerns properly deferred to the Technical Details Consent stage.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CP1CP2CP3CP4
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

120 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Wycombe Area

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice upheld12 June 20263362995
    165 Amersham Road, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, HP13 5AE
  2. Dismissed11 June 20263377185
    Land West of Hammersley Lane, Tylers Green, Bucks, HP10 8HF
  3. Notice varied and upheld1 June 20263356208
    St Regis Park, Bassetsbury Lane, High Wycombe, HP11 1RB
  4. Notice upheld19 May 20263366795
    165 Micklefield Road, High Wycombe, HP13 7HA
  5. Notice upheld19 May 20263364950
    Land at Polaris Chartered Certified Accountants (Royal British Legion), Queensmead Road, Loudwater, Buckinghamshire, HP10 9TZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.