Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed22 August 20253366680

Land at 91 Mayhew Crescent and, to the rear of 83 to 93 Mayhew Crescent, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire , HP13 6DF

the erection of a 2 pairs of semi detached houses (4 in total), with access from Mayhew Crescent involving the demolition of 91 Mayhew Crescent to form an access and remediation works to number 93 Mayhew Crescent

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Wycombe Area *
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Bowden N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development and being mindful of the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, neighbours and future occupants living conditions and protected species

What decided it

Permission in principle is a two-stage process where matters of principle (location, land use and amount) are separated from technical details, and the Inspector found the principle of development acceptable on the merits, with detailed concerns properly deferred to the Technical Details Consent stage.

Plan policies cited: CP1, CP2, CP3, CP4

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.