Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed8 October 20253366713

23 Noyes Avenue, Laxfield, Woodbridge, IP13 8EB

Planning appeal 3366713 at 23 Noyes Avenue, Laxfield, Woodbridge, IP13 8EB (Mid Suffolk District Council) was allowed on 8 October 2025 by Inspector Fern L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the condition relates directly to the development.

Conversion of garage with first floor extension above and single storey infill extension behind. Extend existing pitched roof porch across front with lean-to roof, change to side window and insertion of bay window to front.

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Fern L
Postcode
IP13 8EB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the condition relates directly to the development
  • Whether the condition is reasonable and necessary in the interests of the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • Whether the condition is reasonable and necessary in the interests of the living conditions of the occupants of the host property at No 23 with regard to the amount of outdoor space and the neighbouring property at No 21 with regard to privacy

What decided it

The condition restricting permitted development rights was not justified by clear evidence that further extensions or alterations would harm character and appearance or living conditions, as the GPDO already contains adequate protections and the plot size could accommodate modest further development.

What the Inspector cited

National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 55

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

3 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed18 June 20266006248
    Old Wood Hall, Great Green, Thrandeston, Diss, IP21 4BN
  2. Dismissed21 November 20223289197
    Land Rear of The Six Bells Inn, Church Road, Felsham, Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk, IP30 0PJ
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266012038
    The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
  4. Dismissed14 September 20266010281
    1 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
  5. Dismissed8 September 20266010228
    Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.